Research
SAPIENSQ · MODEL PUBLIC DECISION-MAKERS

We don't forecast rates.
We simulate the committee that decides them.

Built for teams that track policy shifts and need an early, structured view.
Each meeting is reconstructed from records on individual members, rotating seats, prior debates, statements, speeches, and minutes.
The model produces a logged committee-level call, with a decision trace that can be reviewed after the official statement is released.
The FOMC is the first committee modeled.

Kevin M. WarshJerome H. PowellPhilip N. JeffersonJohn C. WilliamsMichael S. BarrMichelle W. BowmanLisa D. CookChristopher J. WallerAnna L. PaulsonBeth M. HammackNeel T. KashkariLorie K. Logan
Warsh · Powell · Jefferson +9
Next meeting · September 16 · 42 days outThe next FOMC meeting, simulated.
Start the simulationInvite-only
94.1%Direction accuracy17 meetings · N=3 majority · Run 1 canonical 100%
1.5Target-rate MAE (bp)94.1% exact-bucket match
The July 29 call · resolved

Locked before the statement.

The FOMC met July 29, 2026.
The simulation locked a HIKE call on July 20, before the statement.
The Committee's decision differed from the locked call. The comparison below shows the hits and the remaining gaps.

Prediction locked
Advance call · 2026-07-20
The simulation's call
HIKE
+25 bp
Target range: 3.75% – 4.00%
Backed a hike in all 19 runs
Michelle W. Bowman
Lorie K. Logan
Beth M. Hammack
Neel T. Kashkari
Report early access
Statement released
Released 2026-07-29
The Committee's call
HOLD
0 bp
Target range: 3.50% – 3.75%
9 assent · 3 dissent · roll call below
Voting record · 12 voters
Beth M. Hammackpreferred to hike by 25 bp
Neel T. Kashkaripreferred to hike by 25 bp
Lorie K. Loganpreferred to hike by 25 bp
Read the full FOMC statement
Recent calls

Recent meetings and locked calls.

Calls are locked before each meeting and scored only after the decision is released.

What's inside

Three parts. One committee.

Each component can be traced through the deliberation transcript.
Request access to inspect the process turn by turn.

01 · Persona

Who is on the committee.

Each member is modeled from statements, votes, and speeches. Membership and voting seats are updated for every meeting. Rotations and new appointments are applied from their effective meeting onward.

Where to look. Each output traces back to the speeches and votes that support it.
02 · Memory

No look-ahead data.

Every source document carries a release date. Each simulation uses only information that was available at the time. Sources include the Beige Book, minutes, statements, and transcripts.

Where to look. Citation tags link each turn to its source and release date.
03 · Deliberation

Deliberation, structured end to end.

The process runs in four phases: briefing, debate, statement drafting, and vote. The draft is grounded in the policy regime of that period.

Where to look. The decision trace is visible step by step.
N=3 reproducibility · fixed model settings

Run it three times. See what stays stable.

Three independent runs across the same 17 historical meetings.
The figures below report mean results.
Per-run breakdowns are available on request.

94.1%
Direction Accuracy
Meeting-level decision accuracy (CUT / HOLD / HIKE)
4.07
Statement Quality Score
Three-model judge ensemble · 1–5 scale
3.37
Minutes Quality Score
Three-model judge ensemble · 1–5 scale
83.6%
Vote Alignment
Per-member vote alignment with the recorded FOMC vote
0.820
Statement Similarity
Semantic similarity to the released FOMC statement
0.727
Minutes Similarity
Semantic similarity to the released FOMC minutes